Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The obsidian wall
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:00, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The obsidian wall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a self-published e-book. Wiki article was written by the author. Promotional in nature. Qualifies for deletion under WP:SNOW. Manway 06:41, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I couldn't find any sources on Google News or Books. — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 06:45, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, I removed much of the promotional language, and cut the article in size by more than half. — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 06:45, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There are zero reliable sources for this book. A search for the title and author brings up a paltry 68 hits, most of which are merchant sites, this Wikipedia article, and mentions of the AfD. No notability here.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:03, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- By the by, I know we've all stated that we need to have a speedy category for books that don't appear to be notable- anyone know where to go to start working on this?Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:07, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- But of course - that would be WT:CSD. — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 14:01, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Although you will need to search the archives - it has come up before a few times. — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 14:08, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Good luck to the author with the book and everything, but the work fails WP:N, to say nothing of WP:CONFLICT and WP:NOTPROMOTION. Dave.Dunford (talk) 18:55, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. 16:30, 15 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 16:30, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.